Consolidate your cannibalised pages
Duplicate content and cannibalisation, where two or more pages conflict with each other for rankings for similar keywords, is a mortal enemy to SEO performance.
Even the best optimised sites have a little cannibalisation, but the majority of sites we see are usually in a bad way. At an enterprise level, it can easily be in the millions of pages.
That’s an awful lot of wasted crawl bandwidth.
Put simply, sites that have this problem will contain many pages perform less well in search.
Look at the data below. In this case, we were tracking two pages that were targeting the same, competitive search term. Both pages were occupying a low 3rd page ranking for the target term.
Redirecting “Page 2” to “Page 1” and consolidating the content to build a fuller, richer page had enough of an impact to put “Page 1” in a low top 10 ranking position. No new links were built.
Detecting duplicate content and page cannibalisation needs careful, keyword by keyword analysis and a ranking data tool that can show multiple pages appearing for the same keyword. The potential gains are significant, though so do consider hunting for cannibalised pages on your site.
If your site hasn’t had the technical SEO attention it deserves, there’ll be a big gain to be made from performing a an analysis of your log data and correctly implementing basic technical improvements including rel=”canonical”, robots noindex, removal of unnecessary duplicate parameters, robots wildcards and so on.
Use the correct schema mark-up for rich snippets
Way, way back we learned< that having rich snippets can positively influence CTR (click through rate) in the search results. Implementing schema.org mark up on your product pages is therefore an absolute “must add” into your SEO development schedule.
As to whether you choose to implement using Microdata or JSON-LD, examples of the latter are still rare. Aaron at SEOskeptic confirmed some time ago that according to Google, a working JSON-LD implementation will generate a rich snippet for a product / review page.
I’d like to feel more confident of the opinion that the data layer should be separated from the presentation layer in a product page, and therefore your testing should focus entirely on implementing JSON-LD. In reality though, I think it’s wise to have the capability to test pages that have either and find what works best for your domain.
Do a good job of image search
This is a fantastic search result from the team at Amara. A top product ranking, flanked by 5 images on their domain or subdomains:
Amara provide a high res (1000x1000px) image to Google (responsive in the browser – very nice) with descriptive filenames (/products/huge/105322/the-mini-cookhouse-clock-squeezy-lemon-911892.jpg) and properly constructed alt attributes.
It’s difficult to tell but perhaps Amara have included image URLs in their XML sitemaps too.
Optimise your body copy for the long tail
We’ll be revisiting some tips to improve your product page copy later in this series because for sales performance and the long tail, high quality, persuasive text is everything.
For search, there are a number of ways that you can improve the individual performance of a product page. This is (of course) assuming that you have “unique” product copy already and you’re looking for ways to improve it. If you’re replicating manufacturer copy then you’re probably already suffering from a Panda inflicted penalty.
Try heading to Search Console and filter for a high performing product page. Then, click “Queries”. You’ll be presented with a list of valuable key phrases that you have some visibility for. It’s unlikely that every phrase will appear in your body copy, so with some careful and sensible copy improvements you should be able to improve the long tail performance of the page.
You can use a similar technique with different tools. OnPage.org’s excellent TD*IDF analyser provides some potentially powerful insight into the terms that most frequently occur on pages that rank well in a search result:
Moz provide a similar tool in their Pro toolset; “Related Topics is a new feature in Moz Pro that helps you understand how phrases and topics influence the SERP, allowing you to broaden your content and build out pages instead of devoting yourself to time-consuming research.”
Tom recently gave a top presentation on the topic of site speed for content marketers at BrightonSEO.
While there’s an awful lot more to page speed optimisation, some of the most notable improvements in page load can be achieved through proper image optimisation.
Look out for:
- Format & Compression – JPEG for photos, PNG for images with fewer colours / transparency. Balance file size & aesthetics.
- Dimensions – What is the maximum width and height at which the image will be displayed?
- Replacements – “The fastest HTTP request is the one not made.”
Aim to use fonts for text, vector graphics for logos and shapes, and CSS effects (shadows, gradients, etc.) wherever possible.
All in all, Tom achieved a 240% page load time improvement by implementing changes in the following categories:
Read Tom’s full presentation here.
Use prefetch & prerender
As Mike King proved, correctly implementing rel=”prerender prefetch” can dramatically improve the page load experience for the user. That’s because the browser is quietly loading the specified page in an invisible tab waiting, hoping (!) that this is the page you’ll request next.
This has potentially very useful implications for product pages on retail sites:
- By prerendering the conversion funnel basket > checkout you could speed up the perceived browsing experience of this crucial final phase in the buyer’s journey
- By prerendering the most likely next clicked link e.g. “top selling product” or the first result in your “related products” sections, you might get lucky and speed up the experience for a significant number of your users. </li
To learn more, read this article by Steve Souders.
Carry out product level competitor link analysis
What’s driving the product level query rankings for your products?
There’s something about URL by URL level analysis that seems to put some SEOs off – it’s as if the thought of reviewing the top 1,000 revenue driving pages is an impossible mountain to climb. It isn’t. It just requires a methodology to make the time used as efficiently as possible.
In my opinion, understanding the types of links required to move a search result is a foundational principle of good SEO.
Take this result for a 1TB SSD (a great search opportunity if you’re in the market). Obviously, Amazon isn’t the only retailer in the search result but I’d argue they provide the baseline level of performance you’ll need to at least get near at the product URL link level to compete. Fortunately, not all of their links are good (take a look and you’ll know what I mean), but the style and type of the good links in that SERP are well worth a study:
- Affiliate sites
- Forums (technical / gaming)
- Reviews (although inevitably these result in affiliate links)
If nothing else, you should realise the value of a) *carefully* promoting products for reviews b) a good old fashioned affiliate program and c) participation in community and forum sites.
I believe knowing your search result vertical at a product level and having a good understanding of the types of links required (and the types of links to definitely, definitively avoid) can make a big difference.
In many cases, you only need 2 or 3 good links for a serious hike in visibility. And remember if you’re still unsure that you can justify the time spent, that’s exactly what your competition would prefer you to think.
Perform product level keyword research and individually optimise meta data
I’ve spent a lot of time with successful small to SME retailers and a common theme amongst them all is an obsession with their products and the product’s presentation. This obsession definitely extends to an interest in optimising at a keyword level, matching the title and description found in the page’s meta data to the query.
If you can’t stomach the idea of managing a list of 10,000 products, break down your task by the top 20 in each of your sub-categories, prioritised by revenue.
I’m a big fan of Keywordtoolbox.io. It’s fast, great at expanding keywords with sortable search volume information. It also has a commonly asked questions section which you can use for an individual FAQ section in your product page copy.
You have to take time to be thorough in the pursuit of marginal gains. If you could increase clicks on your top 1,000 product pages by 5 to 10%, you’d do it, right?
You can even model out the proposed meta descriptions when you’re trying to convince your marketing department the complete product page optimisation process is worth pursuing: